Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Lit Bits: April 24, 2019

From the recent medical literature...


1. Pediatric Corner

A. Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for second-line treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children (ConSEPT): an open-label, multicentre RCT

Dalziel SR, et al. Lancet. 2019 Apr 17 [Epub ahead of print]

BACKGROUND:
Phenytoin is the current standard of care for second-line treatment of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus after failure of first-line benzodiazepines, but is only effective in 60% of cases and is associated with considerable adverse effects. A newer anticonvulsant, levetiracetam, can be given more quickly, is potentially more efficacious, and has a more tolerable adverse effect profile. We aimed to determine whether phenytoin or levetiracetam is the superior second-line treatment for paediatric convulsive status epilepticus.

METHODS:
ConSEPT was an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial conducted in 13 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand. Children aged between 3 months and 16 years, with convulsive status epilepticus that failed first-line benzodiazepine treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated permuted block (block sizes 2 and 4) randomisation sequence, stratified by site and age (≤5 years, above 5 years), to receive 20 mg/kg phenytoin (intravenous or intraosseous infusion over 20 min) or 40 mg/kg levetiracetam (intravenous or intraosseous infusion over 5 min). The primary outcome was clinical cessation of seizure activity 5 min after the completion of infusion of the study drug. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12615000129583.

FINDINGS:
Between March 19, 2015, and Nov 29, 2017, 639 children presented to participating emergency departments with convulsive status epilepticus; 127 were missed, and 278 did not meet eligibility criteria. The parents of one child declined to give consent, leaving 233 children (114 assigned to phenytoin and 119 assigned to levetiracetam) in the intention-to-treat population. Clinical cessation of seizure activity 5 min after completion of infusion of study drug occurred in 68 (60%) patients in the phenytoin group and 60 (50%) patients in the levetiracetam group (risk difference -9·2% [95% CI -21·9 to 3·5]; p=0·16). One participant in the phenytoin group died at 27 days because of haemorrhagic encephalitis; this death was not thought to be due to the study drug. There were no other serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION:
Levetiracetam is not superior to phenytoin for second-line management of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus.

B. First-Line Diagnostic Evaluation with MRI of Children Suspected of Having Acute Appendicitis.

Mushtaq R, et al. Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):170-177.

Background Advances in abdominal MRI have enabled rapid, free-breathing imaging without the need for intravenous or oral contrast material. The use of MRI as the primary imaging modality for suspected appendicitis has not been previously studied. Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI as the initial imaging modality in children suspected of having acute appendicitis.

Materials and Methods The study included consecutive patients 18 years of age and younger presenting with acute abdominal pain at a tertiary care institution from January 2013 through June 2016 who subsequently underwent an unenhanced MRI examination as the primary diagnostic imaging modality. Electronic medical records and radiology reports were retrospectively evaluated for the feasibility and diagnostic performance of MRI, with surgical pathology and follow-up electronic records as reference standards. Statistical analyses were performed by using simple binomial proportions to quantify sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained.

Results After exclusions, 402 patients (median age: 13 years; interquartile range [IQR], 9-15 years; 235 female patients; 167 male patients) were included. Sedation for MRI was required in 13 of 402 patients (3.2%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 5.5%). The appendix was visualized in 349 of 402 patients (86.8%; 95% CI: 83.1%, 90%); for the remaining patients, a diagnosis was provided on the basis of secondary signs of appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI as the primary diagnostic imaging modality for the evaluation of acute appendicitis were 97.9% (95 of 97; 95% CI: 92.8%, 99.8%), 99% (302 of 305; 95% CI: 97.2%, 99.8%), and 98.8% (397 of 402; 97.1%, 99.6%), respectively. Among patients with negative findings for appendicitis at MRI, an alternate diagnosis was provided in 113 of 304 patients (37.2%; 95% CI: 31.7%, 42.9%).

 Conclusion When performed as the initial imaging modality in children suspected of having acute appendicitis, MRI examinations had high diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and in providing alternative diagnoses.

C. Reconsidering the “Classic” Clinical History Associated with Subluxations of the Radial Head.

Pirruccio K, et al. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2).

Introduction: The national burden of radial head subluxations in the United States (U.S.) population is poorly defined, and non-classical injury mechanisms have been increasingly reported in recent years. The purpose of this study is to report historical national estimates and demographic characteristics of patients presenting to U.S. emergency departments (ED) with subluxations of the radial head.

Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study analyzes the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database (2001-2017) to identify patients ≤ 7 years of age presenting to U.S. EDs with subluxations of the radial head.

Results: Linear regression (R2 = 0.65; P less than 0.01) demonstrated that the annual number of patients presenting to U.S. EDs with subluxations of the radial head increased significantly (P less than 0.001) between 2001 (N=13,247; confidence interval [CI], 9,492-17,001) and 2010 (N=21,723; CI, 18,762-24,685), but did not change significantly between 2010 and 2017 (R2 less than 0.01; P = 0.85). It also demonstrated that 51.0% (CI, 45.3%-56.6%) of injuries were either self-induced or spontaneous, whereas 36.8% (CI, 31.6%-42.0%) and 9.4% (CI, 8.0%-10.7%) were associated with parents/guardians or siblings, respectively. The majority of injuries occurred in patients who were the age of one (33.5%; CI, 32.1%-35.0%) and two (35.1%; CI, 33.7%-36.6%); females (57.8%; CI, 56.8%-58.9%) were more commonly injured than males.

Conclusion: Although the national burden of radial head subluxations may be less than previously reported, it still results in over 20,000 ED visits annually in the U.S. Given that over half of such injuries are actually self-induced or spontaneous, caretakers should be taught to recognize the clinical presentation of radial head subluxation, since the classically described history of a patient being lifted or pulled by the arm may simply have never occurred.


D. Long-Term Follow-Up of Infants After a Brief Resolved Unexplained Event-Related Hospitalization.

Ari A, et al. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Apr 3 [Epub ahead of print]

OBJECTIVE:
A brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) in infancy is a common reason for visiting the emergency department. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of such an event. This study evaluates future mortality, morbidity, and/or developmental outcome after a BRUE.

METHODS:
A single-center retrospective study performed in 2009 to 2013 included 87 hospitalized infants (less than 1 year old) fitting the American Academy of Pediatrics' criteria of a lower-risk BRUE, with 2 exceptions: no time limit to duration of episode and no age limit of ≥60 days. Hospitalized infants were followed up for up to 5 years via a telephone questionnaire to assess mortality rates, developmental delay, neurological/cardiovascular morbidity, and future hospitalizations.

RESULTS:
Most infants (94%) who experienced a BRUE were hospitalized before 6 months of age. No cases of mortality occurred. In terms of developmental outcome, 1 child (1.15%) was diagnosed as having a global developmental delay and 12 (13.7%) with a language delay, similar to prevalence rates by age in the United States. Three children (3.4%) were diagnosed as having an autism spectrum disorder, with higher prevalence rates than the global average. Simple febrile and nonfebrile seizures were seen at a rate similar to the general population. None of the children developed cardiovascular disease. Rehospitalization occurred in 22% of cases: 90% for common acute pediatric causes and 10% for recurrent choking events secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease.

CONCLUSIONS:
Low-risk hospitalized infants younger than 1 year who experienced a BRUE seem to generally have an excellent prognosis.

E. Managing the Frightened Child.

Krauss BA, Krauss BS. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 12 [Epub ahead of print]

Introduction
Medical encounters are often frightening for children and stressful for their families. When children are afraid, they resist cooperating and responding to verbal reasoning, inhibiting assessment and treatment.2, 3, 4 For children to cooperate with physical examination and minor procedures, clinicians must first establish a trusting relationship with them.5, 6 Although establishing trust is fundamental to effective interactions with children, there is no systematic approach to teaching this skill. This article describes and demonstrates a practical approach to rapidly establishing trust with children in the emergency department. We deconstruct the elements of clinician-child interactions and elucidate the underlying principles and methods of an approach to establishing trust. Our objective is to place a framework and a set of tools around what emergency physicians are doing intuitively, to enhance effectiveness in their interactions with children. Although what is described below is based on established child development and nonverbal communication research, we have developed much of the practical format and nomenclature presented.


F. Brushing Up on Measles for 2019

Remind me, what does this look like? Here are some photos from the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/measles/about/photos.html

2. Marijuana Cases in the ED

A. Acute Illness Associated with Cannabis Use, by Route of Exposure: An Observational Study

Pot brownies and other cannabis "edibles" like gummy bears that are sold online and where marijuana is legal may seem like harmless fun, but new research indicates that edibles may be more potent and potentially more dangerous than pot that is smoked or vaped. The new study analyzed thousands of cannabis-triggered emergency room visits in the greater Denver area, and found that edibles induced a disproportionate number of pot-related medical crises. 

Monte AA, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 26 [Epub ahead of print]

Background:
Little is known about the relative harms of edible and inhalable cannabis products.

Objective:
To describe and compare adult emergency department (ED) visits related to edible and inhaled cannabis exposure.

Design:
Chart review of ED visits between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016.

Setting:
A large urban academic hospital in Colorado.

Participants:
Adults with ED visits with a cannabis-related International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM), code.

Measurements:
Patient demographic characteristics, route of exposure, dose, symptoms, length of stay, disposition, discharge diagnoses, and attribution of visit to cannabis.

Results:
There were 9973 visits with an ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM code for cannabis use. Of these, 2567 (25.7%) visits were at least partially attributable to cannabis, and 238 of those (9.3%) were related to edible cannabis. Visits attributable to inhaled cannabis were more likely to be for cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (18.0% vs. 8.4%), and visits attributable to edible cannabis were more likely to be due to acute psychiatric symptoms (18.0% vs. 10.9%), intoxication (48% vs. 28%), and cardiovascular symptoms (8.0% vs. 3.1%). Edible products accounted for 10.7% of cannabis-attributable visits between 2014 and 2016 but represented only 0.32% of total cannabis sales in Colorado (in kilograms of tetrahydrocannabinol) in that period.

Limitation:
Retrospective study design, single academic center, self-reported exposure data, and limited availability of dose data.

Conclusion:
Visits attributable to inhaled cannabis are more frequent than those attributable to edible cannabis, although the latter is associated with more acute psychiatric visits and more ED visits than expected.

B. Unintentional Pediatric Marijuana Exposures Prior to and After Legalization and Commercial Availability of Recreational Marijuana in Washington State

Thomas AA, et al. J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):398-404.

BACKGROUND:
Washington State was one of the first states to legalize recreational marijuana. Increased availability of marijuana may result in more unintentional pediatric exposure, which often presents as altered mental status with unknown cause.

OBJECTIVES:
To quantify unintentional pediatric marijuana exposures reported to the Washington Poison Center (WAPC) prior to and after legalization and commercial availability of recreational marijuana.

METHODS:
Data were obtained from the WAPC database, toxiCALL®. Patients ≤ 9 years old with a reported marijuana exposure between July 2010 and July 2016 were included in the analysis. Patient and exposure characteristics were summarized and median exposure frequencies were calculated for the periods prior to and after legalization.

RESULTS:
There were 161 cases meeting the inclusion criteria that occurred between July 2010 and July 2016. Of these, 130 (81%) occurred in the 2.5-year period after legalization of recreational marijuana in January 2013. The median age of exposed children was 2 years (range 0-9 years). Eighty-one percent of the exposures occurred in the child's own home. The number of exposures per month increased after recreational marijuana was legalized in November 2012, and increased further once recreational marijuana shops were legally allowed to open in July 2014.

CONCLUSION:
Reported unintentional pediatric marijuana exposure has increased in the state of Washington since recreational marijuana was legalized. As marijuana becomes more available, clinicians should be aware of the risk of unintentional pediatric marijuana exposure, and this should inform lawmakers regarding regulations around childhood exposure to marijuana.

C. Prenatal marijuana exposure tied to risk of childhood psychosis


3. ACS Research

A. Evaluation of Outpatient Cardiac Stress Testing After ED Encounters for Suspected ACS.

Natsui S, et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 5 [Epub ahead of print]

STUDY OBJECTIVE:
Professional guidelines recommend 72-hour cardiac stress testing after an emergency department (ED) evaluation for possible acute coronary syndrome. There are limited data on actual compliance rates and effect on patient outcomes. Our aim is to describe rates of completion of noninvasive cardiac stress testing and associated 30-day major adverse cardiac events.

METHODS:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of ED encounters from June 2015 to June 2017 across 13 community EDs within an integrated health system in Southern California. The study population included all adults with a chest pain diagnosis, troponin value, and discharge with an order for an outpatient cardiac stress test. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed an outpatient stress test within the recommended 3 days, 4 to 30 days, or not at all. Secondary analysis described the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events.

RESULTS:
During the study period, 24,459 patients presented with a chest pain evaluation requiring troponin analysis and stress test ordering from the ED. Of these, we studied the 7,988 patients who were discharged home to complete diagnostic testing, having been deemed appropriate by the treating clinicians for an outpatient stress test. The stress test completion rate was 31.3% within 3 days and 58.7% between 4 and 30 days, and 10.0% of patients did not complete the ordered test. The 30-day rates of major adverse cardiac events were low (death 0.0%, acute myocardial infarction 0.7%, and revascularization 0.3%). Rapid receipt of stress testing was not associated with improved 30-day major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.54).

CONCLUSION:
Less than one third of patients completed outpatient stress testing within the guideline-recommended 3 days after initial evaluation. More important, the low adverse event rates suggest that selective outpatient stress testing is safe. In this cohort of patients selected for outpatient cardiac stress testing in a well-integrated health system, there does not appear to be any associated benefit of stress testing within 3 days, nor within 30 days, compared with those who never received testing at all. The lack of benefit of obtaining timely testing, in combination with low rates of objective adverse events, may warrant reassessment of the current guidelines.

B. Misclassification of Myocardial Injury as Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Assessing Outcomes in Value-Based Programs.

McCarthy C, et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 17 [Epub ahead of print].

Key Points
Question  To what extent are patients with myocardial injury being misclassified as having type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) and what are the possible implications for 30-day readmission and mortality rates?

Findings  This study used the new International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code to identify 633 patients who were coded as having T2MI. After strict adjudication, only 57% of patients met the criteria for T2MI and 42% had myocardial injury; both groups had similar in-hospital mortality rates and 30-day mortality and readmission rates.

Meaning  A substantial proportion of patients who are coded as having T2MI actually have myocardial injury, which likely has implications for hospital reimbursement under current policy programs.

Introduction
With the widespread introduction of high-sensitivity troponin assays, the detection of myocardial injury in hospitalized patients has become more frequent; currently, the most common cause of troponin elevation may now be nonischemic myocardial injury rather than acute myocardial infarction (MI).1 The detection of abnormal troponin concentrations in the absence of ischemia has led to confusion; this circumstance has frequently been labeled as “troponinemia,” “troponinitis,” or incorrectly as a type 2 MI (T2MI; for which coronary ischemia is a prerequisite). To address this confusion, the fourth universal definition of MI distinguishes the various subtypes of MI from myocardial injury.2 Specifically, myocardial injury is defined by at least 1 cardiac troponin concentration above the 99th percentile upper reference limit.2 Myocardial infarction is a form of myocardial injury but requires clinical evidence of acute myocardial ischemia. The most common subtypes are type 1 MI (T1MI; characterized by plaque rupture, ulceration, erosion, or dissection resulting in coronary thrombosis) and T2MI (infarction from myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatch in the absence of atherothrombosis).2

Currently, as with other patients with acute MI, patients with T2MI are included in several value-based programs, such as the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program.3 To our knowledge, how often patients with myocardial injury are being misclassified as T2MI is unknown and may have implications for these programs. Since an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code for T2MI was introduced in October 2017, there is an opportunity to characterize patients who are coded as having T2MI…

Abstract
Importance  Similar to other patients with acute myocardial infarction, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) are included in several value-based programs, including the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. To our knowledge, whether nonischemic myocardial injury is being misclassified as T2MI is unknown and may have implications for these programs.

Objective  To determine whether patients with nonischemic myocardial injury are being miscoded as having T2MI and if this has implications for 30-day readmission and mortality rates.

Design, Settings, and Participants  Using the new International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code, we identified patients who were coded as having T2MI between October 2017 and May 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Strict adjudication using the fourth universal definition of MI was then applied.

Main outcome and Measures  Clinical adjudication of T2MI and 30-day readmission and mortality rates as a function of T2MI or nonischemic myocardial injury.

Results  Of 633 patients, 369 (58.3%) were men and 514 (81.2%) were white. After strict adjudication, 359 (56.7%) had T2MI, 265 (41.9%) had myocardial injury, 6 (0.9%) had type 1 MI, and 3 (0.5%) had unstable angina. Patients with T2MI had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than those with myocardial injury. Patients with T2MI and myocardial injury had high in-hospital mortality rates (10.6% and 8.7%, respectively; P = .50). Of those discharged alive (563 [88.9%]), 30-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 21.1%; P = .68) and mortality rates (4.4% vs 7.4%; P = .14) were comparable among patients with T2MI and myocardial injury.

Conclusions and Relevance  A substantial percentage of patients coded as having T2MI actually have myocardial injury. Both conditions have high 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Including patients with high-risk myocardial injury may have substantial implications for value-based programs.


C. Cocaine Positivity in STEMI: A True or False Association.

Ifedili I, et al. Perm J. 2019;23. pii: 18-048

INTRODUCTION

Among the 250,000 patients who arrive at US Emergency Departments each year with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a subpopulation will test positive for cocaine use.1 The diagnosis of true STEMI in the setting of cocaine positivity can be a challenge because more than 500,000 US Emergency Department visits each year are related to symptoms and complications associated with cocaine use and, in particular, cardiovascular symptoms,2 which usually necessitate an electrocardiogram (ECG). A new ECG ST-segment elevation finding in a patient with cardiovascular symptoms, especially chest pain and worsening shortness of breath, usually triggers cardiac catheterization laboratory activation in adherence with current guidelines.3 However, false activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory when treating the general population may be as high as 36%.4 A US prospective observational study revealed a false STEMI rate of 11%,5 and this value may be higher in the cocaine-use setting considering the prevalence of a true myocardial infarction is 0.7% to 6.0% for chest pain presentations.2 False findings may occur because various mechanisms can cause chest pain symptoms and cardiovascular complications.6 A better understanding of the predictors of true STEMI in the cocaine-positive (CPos) population would enable better-informed decisions between patients and physicians, leading to optimal care and avoiding complications associated with unnecessary and invasive coronary angiography. The aims of this study were to identify the frequency and factors associated with true STEMI in patients with CPos findings who present with suspected STEMI and to create a predictive model to help classify those who may be more likely to experience a true positive STEMI….

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Every year, more than 500,000 US Emergency Department visits are associated with cocaine use. People who use cocaine tend to have a lower incidence of true ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

OBJECTIVE:
To identify the factors associated with true STEMI in patients with cocaine-positive (CPos) findings.

METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed 1144 consecutive patients with STEMI between 2008 and 2013. True STEMI was defined as having a culprit lesion on coronary angiogram. Multivariate and univariate analyses were used to identify risk factors and create a predictive model.

RESULTS:
A total of 64 patients with suspected STEMI were CPos (mean age 53.1 ± 11.2 years; male = 80%). True STEMI was diagnosed in 34 patients. Patients with CPos true STEMI were more likely to be uninsured than those with false STEMI (61.8% vs 34.5%, p = 0.03) and have higher peak troponin levels (21.1 ng/mL vs 2.12 ng/mL, p = less than 0.01) with no difference in mean age between the 2 groups (p = 0.24). In multivariate analyses, independent predictors of true STEMI in patients with CPos findings included age older than 65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 19.3, 95% confidence iterval [CI] = 1.2-318.3), lack of health insurance (OR = 4.9, 95% CI = 1.2-19.6), and troponin level higher than 0.05 (OR = 24.0, 95% CI = 2.6-216.8) (all p less than 0.05). A multivariate risk score created with a C-statistic of 82% (95% CI = 71-93) significantly improved the identification of patients with true STEMI.

CONCLUSION:
Among those with suspected STEMI, patients with CPos findings had a higher incidence of false STEMI. Older age, lack of health insurance, and troponin levels outside of defined limits were associated with true STEMI in this group.


D. Some Kinds of Stress Really Do Contribute to ACS

Song H, et al. Stress related disorders and risk of cardiovascular disease: population based, sibling controlled cohort study. BMJ. 2019 Apr 10;365:l1255.

Objective To assess the association between stress related disorders and subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease.

Design Population based, sibling controlled cohort study.

Setting Population of Sweden.

Participants 136 637 patients in the Swedish National Patient Register with stress related disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), acute stress reaction, adjustment disorder, and other stress reactions, from 1987 to 2013; 171 314 unaffected full siblings of these patients; and 1 366 370 matched unexposed people from the general population.

Main outcome measures Primary diagnosis of incident cardiovascular disease—any or specific subtypes (ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, emboli/thrombosis, hypertensive diseases, heart failure, arrhythmia/conduction disorder, and fatal cardiovascular disease)—and 16 individual diagnoses of cardiovascular disease. Hazard ratios for cardiovascular disease were derived from Cox models, after controlling for multiple confounders.

Results During up to 27 years of follow-up, the crude incidence rate of any cardiovascular disease was 10.5, 8.4, and 6.9 per 1000 person years among exposed patients, their unaffected full siblings, and the matched unexposed individuals, respectively. In sibling based comparisons, the hazard ratio for any cardiovascular disease was 1.64 (95% confidence interval 1.45 to 1.84), with the highest subtype specific hazard ratio observed for heart failure (6.95, 1.88 to 25.68), during the first year after the diagnosis of any stress related disorder. Beyond one year, the hazard ratios became lower (overall 1.29, 1.24 to 1.34), ranging from 1.12 (1.04 to 1.21) for arrhythmia to 2.02 (1.45 to 2.82) for artery thrombosis/embolus. Stress related disorders were more strongly associated with early onset cardiovascular diseases (hazard ratio 1.40 (1.32 to 1.49) for attained age less than 50) than later onset ones (1.24 (1.18 to 1.30) for attained age ≥50; P for difference=0.002). Except for fatal cardiovascular diseases, these associations were not modified by the presence of psychiatric comorbidity. Analyses within the population matched cohort yielded similar results (hazard ratio 1.71 (1.59 to 1.83) for any cardiovascular disease during the first year of follow-up and 1.36 (1.33 to 1.39) thereafter).

Conclusion Stress related disorders are robustly associated with multiple types of cardiovascular disease, independently of familial background, history of somatic/psychiatric diseases, and psychiatric comorbidity.


4. Infectious Disease

A. Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Pts with Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK RCT

Hernandez G, et al. JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):654-664.

Abnormal peripheral perfusion after septic shock resuscitation has been associated with organ dysfunction and mortality. The potential role of the clinical assessment of peripheral perfusion as a target during resuscitation in early septic shock has not been established.

OBJECTIVE:
To determine if a peripheral perfusion-targeted resuscitation during early septic shock in adults is more effective than a lactate level-targeted resuscitation for reducing mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 28 intensive care units in 5 countries. Four-hundred twenty-four patients with septic shock were included between March 2017 and March 2018. The last date of follow-up was June 12, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS:
Patients were randomized to a step-by-step resuscitation protocol aimed at either normalizing capillary refill time (n = 212) or normalizing or decreasing lactate levels at rates greater than 20% per 2 hours (n = 212), during an 8-hour intervention period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:
The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were organ dysfunction at 72 hours after randomization, as assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0 [best] to 24 [worst]); death within 90 days; mechanical ventilation-, renal replacement therapy-, and vasopressor-free days within 28 days; intensive care unit and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS:
Among 424 patients randomized (mean age, 63 years; 226 [53%] women), 416 (98%) completed the trial. By day 28, 74 patients (34.9%) in the peripheral perfusion group and 92 patients (43.4%) in the lactate group had died (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02]; P = .06; risk difference, -8.5% [95% CI, -18.2% to 1.2%]). Peripheral perfusion-targeted resuscitation was associated with less organ dysfunction at 72 hours (mean SOFA score, 5.6 [SD, 4.3] vs 6.6 [SD, 4.7]; mean difference, -1.00 [95% CI, -1.97 to -0.02]; P = .045). There were no significant differences in the other 6 secondary outcomes. No protocol-related serious adverse reactions were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:
Among patients with septic shock, a resuscitation strategy targeting normalization of capillary refill time, compared with a strategy targeting serum lactate levels, did not reduce all-cause 28-day mortality.

Ryan Radecki’s comments: https://www.emlitofnote.com/?p=4393

B. Most qSOFA-Positive Patients Do Not Have Sepsis

In a database review, only 40% of admitted qSOFA-positive patients had a diagnosis of infection on discharge, and only 13% had a diagnosis of sepsis.

Anand V, et al. Epidemiology of qSOFA Criteria in Undifferentiated Patients and Association with Suspected Infection and Sepsis. Chest. 2019 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print]

BACKGROUND:
The role of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria in sepsis screening and management is controversial, particularly as they were derived only in patients with suspected infection. We examined the epidemiology and prognostic value of qSOFA in undifferentiated patients.

METHODS:
We identified patients with ≥2 qSOFA criteria within 1 day of admission among all adults admitted to 85 U.S. hospitals from 2012-2015 and assessed for suspected infection using clinical cultures and antibiotics and sepsis using Sepsis-3 criteria. We also examined qSOFA's discrimination for in-hospital mortality in patients with and without suspected infection using regression models.

RESULTS:
Of 1,004,347 hospitalized patients, 271,500 (27.0%) were qSOFA-positive on admission. Compared to qSOFA-negative patients, qSOFA-positive patients were older (median 65 vs 58 years), required ICU admission more often (28.5% vs 6.5%) and had higher mortality (6.7% vs 0.8%) (p less than 0.001 for all comparisons). Sensitivities of qSOFA for suspected infection and sepsis were 41.3% (95% CI 41.1-41.5%) and 62.8% (95% CI 62.4-63.1%), respectively; positive predictive values were 31.3% (95% CI 30.8-31.1%) and 17.4% (95% CI 17.2-17.5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic for mortality for qSOFA was lower in patients with suspected infection versus those without (0.814 vs 0.875, p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:
Only 1 in 3 patients who are qSOFA-positive on admission have suspected infection and 1 in 6 have sepsis. qSOFA also has low sensitivity for identifying suspected infection and sepsis and its prognostic significance is not specific to infection. More sensitive and specific tools for sepsis screening and risk-stratification are needed.

C. Updated IDSA Guidelines for Managing Asymptomatic Bacteriuria

Jason T. McMullan, MD, MS. Journal Watch. April 17, 2019

Source: Nicolle LE et al. Clin Infect Dis 2019 Mar 21

Screening for, or treating, asymptomatic bacteriuria is not recommended, except in pregnant patients.

Sponsoring Organization: Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)

Background and Objective
Nontreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a priority in antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. This update to the 2005 IDSA guidelines incorporates new evidence and addresses additional populations, including children, patients with neutropenia, recipients of solid organ transplants, and patients undergoing nonurologic surgery.

Key Recommendations
Screening for, and then treating, asymptomatic bacteriuria is recommended for pregnant women; 4 to 7 days of antibiotics is recommended for pregnant women with ASB.

Screening and treatment is not recommended in the following populations: infants and children; healthy nonpregnant women of any age; elderly persons living independently or in a long-term care facility; patients with diabetes; renal transplant recipients beyond 1 month after surgery; any nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients; patients with spinal cord injury; and patients with indwelling urinary catheters of any duration.

No recommendation is made for high-risk afebrile neutropenic patients due to lack of evidence.

Observation is preferred over antimicrobial treatment for cognitively impaired adults who experience a fall and are found to have bacteriuria without signs of infection.

COMMENT
These guidelines reinforce that the risks associated with treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria generally outweigh the benefits, even in populations generally considered fragile. Notably, symptomatic patients are not covered by these recommendations.


5. RCT Comparing Procedural Amnesia and Respiratory Depression Between Moderate and Deep Sedation with Propofol in the ED

Schick A, et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;26(4):364-374.

OBJECTIVES:
The objective was to determine if there is a difference in procedural amnesia and adverse respiratory events (AREs) between the target sedation levels of moderate (MS) and deep (DS) procedural sedation.

METHODS:
This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of consenting adult patients planning to undergo DS with propofol between March 5, 2015, and May 24, 2017. Patients were randomized to a target sedation level of MS or DS using the American Society of Anesthesiologist's definitions. Drug doses, vital signs, observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAAS) score, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2 ), and the need for supportive airway maneuvers (SAMs; bag-valve mask use, repositioning, and stimulation to induce respirations) were monitored continuously. A standardized image was shown every 30 seconds starting 3 minutes before the procedure continuing until the patient had returned to baseline after the procedure. Recall and recognition of images were assessed 10 minutes after the sedation. Subclinical respiratory depression (RD) was defined as SaO2 ≤ 91%, change in ETCO2 ≥ 10 mm Hg, or absent ETCO2 at any time. The occurrence of RD with a SAM was defined as an ARE. Patient satisfaction, pain, and perceived recollection and physician assessment of procedure difficulty were collected using visual analog scales (VASs). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS:
A total of 107 patients were enrolled: 54 randomized to target MS and 53 to DS. Of the patients randomized to target MS, 50% achieved MS and 50% achieved DS. In the target DS group, 77% achieved DS and 23% achieved MS. The median total propofol dose (mg/kg) was lower in the MS group: MS 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-1.6, IQR = 1) versus DS 1.8 (95% CI = 1.6-2.0, IQR = 0.9). There were no differences in median OAAS during the procedure (MS 2.4 and DS 2.8), lowest OAAS (MS 2 and DS 2), percentage of images recalled (MS 4.7% vs. DS 3.8%, p = 0.73), or percentage of images recognized (MS 61.1% vs. DS 55%, p = 0.52). In the MS group, 41% patients had any AREs compared to 42% in the DS group (p = 0.77, 95% CI difference = -0.12 to 0.24). The total number of AREs was 23% lower in the MS group (p = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.41 to -0.04). There was no difference in patient-reported pain, satisfaction, or recollection VAS scores. Provider's rating of procedural difficulty and procedural success were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS:
Targeting MS or DS did not reliably result in the intended sedation level. Targeting MS, however, resulted in a lower rate of total AREs and fewer patients had multiple AREs with no difference in procedural recall. As seen in previous reports, patients who achieved MS had less AREs than those who achieved DS. Our study suggests that a target of MS provides adequate amnesia with less need for supportive airway interventions than a target level of DS, despite the fact that it often does not result in intended sedation level.


6. Orthopedic Surgeon Pays $400K to Keep Son Out of Ophthalmology Residency: A twist in the college cheating scandal

by Gomer Blog Team. March 21, 2019. Disclaimer: This post is from GomerBlog, a satirical site about healthcare.

Inspired by the recent college admissions cheating scandal, orthopedic surgeon Brock Hammersley took matters into his own hands when his son ranked only ophthalmology residencies in the ACGME Match.

"I couldn't believe it when I saw his rank list! Ophthalmology Harvard, Ophthalmology Mass. Eye and Ear, Ophthalmology Duke, Ophthalmology Tinyhandsville!" Hammersley fumed to GomerBlog.

"You think you're raising your kids right. You start taking them to the gym as soon as they can walk, pay for the best bicep-building trainers starting when they're 3, buy them their own mallet at 4, power tools at 5. You know, trying to do everything you can to make sure they're started down the right path. Then one day -- BAM! It all blows up in your face and they apply to do a residency without power tools where they sit down for every surgery! They sit down to do surgery!"

"So, I did what any caring parent would do, I sat him down and chewed his ass. 'Listen here, Brock Jr., I know some of your friends have chosen alternative career paths, but I want something better for you. Please tell me you somehow accidentally put random p's and h's in your poor attempt to spell orthopedics, and we can get back to playing beer pong with your mother and sister.'"

Hammersley stopped as tears were forming in his eyes at this point, "Then he looks me in the eyes and said the six words every parent fears the most: 'I really want to do ophthalmology.'"

"After all the sacrifices we made for him, he insults our family like this. I felt helpless until I heard what that loving mother Lori Loughlin did for her kids, and I got an idea."

Hammersley then proceeded to call the American Academy of Ophthalmology president, Dr. George A. Williams, and offered a $400,000 "donation" to the Beaumont Eye Institute. "The study of some sort of eyeball stuff was the pretense, but Dr. Williams wouldn't promise to 'guide' the match results for Brock Jr.," Hammersley recalled.

"Fortunately, I was able to pull a few strings elsewhere -- greased with the 400 G's -- and what do you know, Brock Jr. matched ortho at my alma mater, the University of Michigan! The Lord really does work in mysterious ways!"

7. Trauma Track

A. Observing pneumothoraces: The 35-millimeter rule is safe for both blunt and penetrating chest trauma.

Bou Zein Eddine S, et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Apr;86(4):557-564.

BACKGROUND:
As more pneumothoraxes (PTX) are being identified on chest computed tomography (CT), the empiric trigger for tube thoracostomy (TT) versus observation remains unclear. We hypothesized that PTX measuring 35 mm or less on chest CT can be safely observed in both penetrating and blunt trauma mechanisms.

METHODS:
A retrospective review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with PTX by chest CT between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients were excluded if they had an associated hemothorax, an immediate TT (TT placed before the initial chest CT), or if they were on mechanical ventilation. Size of PTX was quantified by measuring the radial distance between the parietal and visceral pleura/mediastinum in a line perpendicular to the chest wall on axial imaging of the largest air pocket. Based on previous work, a cutoff of 35 mm on the initial CT was used to dichotomize the groups. Failure of observation was defined as the need for a delayed TT during the first week. A univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failure in both groups, and multivariate analysis was constructed to assess the independent impact of PTX measurement on the failure of observation while controlling for demographics and chest injuries.

RESULTS:
Of the 1,767 chest trauma patients screened, 832 (47%) had PTX, and of those meeting inclusion criteria, 257 (89.0%) were successfully observed until discharge. Of those successfully observed, 247 (96%) patients had a measurement of 35 mm or less. The positive predictive value for 35 mm as a cutoff was 90.8% to predict successful observation. In the univariant analyses, rib fractures (p = 0.048), Glasgow Coma Scale (p = 0.012), and size of the PTX (≤35 mm or over 35 mm) (P less than 0.0001) were associated with failed observation. In multivariate analysis, PTX measuring 35 mm or less was an independent predictor of successful observation (odds ratio, 0.142; 95% confidence interval, 0.047-0.428)] for the combined blunt and penetrating trauma patients.

CONCLUSION:
A 35-mm cutoff is safe as a general guide with only 9% of stable patients failing initial observation regardless of mechanism.

B. Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines

Kochanek P, et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019;20(35):S1–S82.

Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Infants, Children, and Adolescents in 2019: Some Overdue Progress, Many Remaining Questions, and Exciting Ongoing Work in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury Research

In order to promote the highest standards of care and improve overall rates of survival and recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI), a panel of pediatric critical care, neurosurgery, and other pediatric experts published "Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines."

Published in the March 2019 issue of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, these updated guidelines include results from nearly 50 research studies and a range of treatment recommendations for healthcare providers, including intracranial monitoring and the use of hypertonic saline to reduce acute brain swelling.

An
executive summary is also available, along with an associated article, "Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury," which describes an algorithm designed to guide first- and second-tier therapies for infants and children with severe TBI.

METHODS
The methods for developing these guidelines were organized in two phases: a systematic review, assessment, and synthesis of the literature; and use of that product as the foundation for evidence-based recommendations. These guidelines are the product of the two-phased, evidence-based process.

Based on almost 2 decades of collaboration, the team of clinical investigators and methodologists is grounded in and adheres to the fundamental principles of evidence-based medicine to derive recommendations, and is committed to maintaining the distinction between evidence and consensus. It is important that this distinction is clear to promote transparency and inspire innovative future research that will expand the evidence base for TBI care.

Because these guidelines only provide recommendations based on available evidence, most often they do not provide direction for all phases of clinical care. Ideally, clinically useful protocols begin with evidence-based guidelines, and then use clinical experience and consensus to fill the gaps where evidence is insufficient. The goal is to use the evidence and the evidence-based recommendations as the backbone to which expertise and consensus can be added to produce protocols appropriate to specific clinical environments.



C. Buddy Taping Is as Effective as Plaster Immobilization for Adults with an Uncomplicated Neck of Fifth Metacarpal Fracture. A RCT

Pellatt R, et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 7 [Epub ahead of print]

STUDY OBJECTIVE:
We compare buddy taping with plaster casting for uncomplicated fifth metacarpal (boxer's) fractures. We hypothesize buddy taping will give superior functional outcomes at 12 weeks, defined as a 10-point difference on the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score.

[What is uncomplicated? “minimally displaced, closed, isolated injuries, with a fracture angulation up to 70 degrees”]

METHODS:
This randomized controlled trial included patients aged 18 to 70 years, with uncomplicated boxer's fractures in 2 hospitals in Queensland, Australia. The intervention consisted of buddy taping of the ring and little fingers on the affected side, in which the control group received plaster casting. Primary outcome was hand function as measured by quickDASH score (0 to 100, with 0 indicating no disability) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes measured at 3, 6, and 12 weeks included time off work and activities, pain, satisfaction, and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level score (measure of overall health).

RESULTS:
Ninety-seven patients with primary endpoint data were available for analysis, 48 in the buddy taping group and 49 in the plaster group. At 12 weeks, median quickDASH scores were the same for both groups (buddy 0, interquartile range [IQR] 0 to 2.3; plaster 0, IQR 0 to 4; difference 0; 95% confidence interval of the difference 0 to 0). Patients in the buddy taping group missed a median 0 days (IQR 0 to 7) of work compared with the plaster group's 2 days (IQR 0 to 14). Other secondary outcome measures were the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION:
We found that patients with boxer's fractures who were randomized to buddy taping had functional outcomes similar to those of patients randomized to plaster cast at 12 weeks. We advocate a minimal intervention such as buddy taping for uncomplicated boxer's fractures.


8. Full Study Report of Andexanet Alfa for Bleeding Associated with Factor Xa Inhibitors

Connolly SJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1326-1335

BACKGROUND
Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive form of human factor Xa developed for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors.

METHODS
We evaluated 352 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients received a bolus of andexanet, followed by a 2-hour infusion. The coprimary outcomes were the percent change in anti–factor Xa activity after andexanet treatment and the percentage of patients with excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours after the end of the infusion, with hemostatic efficacy adjudicated on the basis of prespecified criteria. Efficacy was assessed in the subgroup of patients with confirmed major bleeding and baseline anti–factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.25 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin).

RESULTS
Patients had a mean age of 77 years, and most had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly intracranial (in 227 patients [64%]) or gastrointestinal (in 90 patients [26%]). In patients who had received apixaban, the median anti–factor Xa activity decreased from 149.7 ng per milliliter at baseline to 11.1 ng per milliliter after the andexanet bolus (92% reduction; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91 to 93); in patients who had received rivaroxaban, the median value decreased from 211.8 ng per milliliter to 14.2 ng per milliliter (92% reduction; 95% CI, 88 to 94). Excellent or good hemostasis occurred in 204 of 249 patients (82%) who could be evaluated. Within 30 days, death occurred in 49 patients (14%) and a thrombotic event in 34 (10%). Reduction in anti–factor Xa activity was not predictive of hemostatic efficacy overall but was modestly predictive in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS
In patients with acute major bleeding associated with the use of a factor Xa inhibitor, treatment with andexanet markedly reduced anti–factor Xa activity, and 82% of patients had excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours, as adjudicated according to prespecified criteria.

9. Pearls and Myths in the Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Acute PE

Stüssi-Helbling M, et al. Am J Med. 2019 Jan 31 [Epub ahead of print]

Significant improvement has been achieved in diagnostic accuracy, validation of probability scores, and standardized treatment algorithms for patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. These developments have provided the tools for a safe and cost-effective management for most of these patients. In our experience, however, the presence of medical myths and ongoing controversies seem to hinder the implementation of these tools in everyday clinical practice. This review provides a selection of such dilemmas and controversies and discusses the published evidence beyond them. By doing so, we try to overcome these dilemmas and suggest pragmatic approaches guided by the available evidence and current guidelines.

MYTH: THE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT (“CLINICAL GESTALT”) IS INFERIOR TO STANDARDIZED
PREDICTION SCORES (“CLINICAL DECISION RULES”)

MYTH: THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS HAS IMPROVED DUE TO MORE FREQUENT DETECTION OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM

MYTH: PULMONARY EMBOLISM CANNOT BE SAFELY RULED OUT WITHOUT D-DIMER TESTING OR CTA

MYTH: PATIENTS WITH A SYNCOPAL EVENT SHOULD BE TESTED FOR THE PRESENCE OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM

MYTH: THE LOCALIZATION AND EXTENT OF VASCULAR OBSTRUCTION IS AN INDICATOR OF
HEMODYNAMIC COMPROMISE (SEVERITY OF DISEASE)

MYTH: THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM HAS NO ROLE IN ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM

MYTH: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND CARDIAC BIOMARKERS ARE PART OF THE ROUTINE
EVALUATION IN STABLE PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY EMBOLISM

MYTH: THROMBOPHILIA SCREENING SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN PATIENTS WITH UNPROVOKED PULMONARY EMBOLISM

MYTH: ALL PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY EMBOLISM SHOULD BE TREATED AS INPATIENTS

10. Images in Clinical Practice

Disseminated Cysticercosis

Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis with Pneumoperitoneum

Disseminated Gonococcal Infection

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Traumatic Iridodialysis

Diffuse Subcutaneous Emphysema

Rhinosporidiosis

Tungiasis

11. FDA Gives Go Ahead to Novel Device That Treats Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

By Kristin J. Kelley. Journal Watch EM. March 18, 2019

Edited by Susan Sadoughi, MD, and André Sofair, MD, MPH

The FDA late last week approved marketing for a device (ClearMate) that can be used in emergency departments to treat patients for carbon monoxide poisoning.

The device will help minimize treatment delays for patients with the most severe cases of exposure, who need to be treated in hyperbaric chambers. The agency notes that only 60 medical centers in the country have these units.

ClearMate delivers 100% oxygen, plus a combination of oxygen and carbon dioxide, which forces the patient to breathe faster and expel the carbon monoxide quickly. Marketing authorization was based on data from multiple studies (of 100 patients total) in which the device eliminated carbon monoxide faster than treatment with only 100% oxygen but no faster than hyperbaric oxygen. No complications related to the device were reported.


CDC FAQ on carbon monoxide poisoning (free): https://www.cdc.gov/co/faqs.htm

12. Migraine Research

A. The Efficacy and Safety of Prochlorperazine in Patients with Acute Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Golikhatir I, et al. Headache. 2019 Apr 16. doi: 10.1111/head.13527. [Epub ahead of print]

OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prochlorperazine (PCP) in patients with acute migraine headache in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS:
Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched for randomized clinical trials that investigated the effect of PCP on headache relief. The outcomes were the number of patients without headache or with reduced headache severity, the number of adverse events, and the need for rescue analgesia.

RESULTS:
From 450 citations, 11 studies (n = 771) with 15 comparison arms met the inclusion criteria. Overall, PCP was more effective than placebo (OR = 7.23; 95% CI = 3.82-3.68), metoclopramide (OR = 2.89; 95% CI = 1.42-5.86), and other active comparators (OR = 3.70; 95% CI = 2.41-5.67) for headache relief. The odds ratio of experiencing adverse events with PCP compared with placebo was 5.79 (95% CI = 2.43-13.79). When PCP compared with other active comparators, no statistical difference was found regarding the overall number of adverse events (OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 0.99-3.59). However, PCP significantly increased the odds of akathisia/dystonia (OR = 2.55; 95% CI = 1.03-6.31). The request for rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the PCP group compared with other groups (16% vs 84%; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.09-27).

CONCLUSIONS:
For adult patients with acute migraine, PCP could effectively abort the acute attack and reduce the request for rescue analgesia in the ED. However, compared with placebo, PCP could increase the risk of adverse events.

B. Migraine Treatment in Pregnant Women Presenting to Acute Care: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Hamilton KT, et al. Headache. 2019 Feb;59(2):173-179.

OBJECTIVE:
To assess the acute treatment of pregnant women presenting to a hospital with migraine.

BACKGROUND:
Migraine is a common problem in pregnancy; however, migraine treatment is challenging in pregnant women for fears of medication teratogenicity and lack of data in this population. To date, no study has directly explored physician practices for treatment of acute migraine in pregnant women.

METHODS:
We conducted a retrospective chart review of medication administration for pregnant women who presented to an acute care setting with a migraine attack and received neurology consultation between 2009 and 2014.

RESULTS:
We identified 72 pregnant women with migraine who were treated with pain medications. Fifty-one percent (37/72) were in the third trimester of pregnancy, 39% (28/72) in the second trimester, and 10% (7/72) in the first trimester. Thirty-two percent (23/72) had not tried any acute medications at home before coming to the hospital, and 47% (34/72) presented in status migrainosus. Patients received treatment in the hospital for a median of 23 hours (interquartile range = 5-45 hours). The most common medications prescribed were metoclopramide in 74% (53/72) of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 62-82%) and acetaminophen in 69% (50/72) of patients (95% CI 58-79%). Metoclopramide was administered along with diphenhydramine in 81% (44/53) of patients (95% CI 71-91%). Acetaminophen was the most frequent medicine administered first (53%, 38/72). Patients were often treated with butalbital (35%, 25/72) or opioids (30%, 22/72), which were used as second- or third-line treatments in 29% of patients (20/72). Thirty-eight percent (27/72) received an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus, 24% received IV magnesium (17/72), and 6% (4/72) had peripheral nerve blocks performed.

CONCLUSIONS:
While the majority of pregnant women with acute migraine received medications considered relatively safe in pregnancy, there was variation in treatment choice and sequence. Some acute medications considered potentially hazardous for fetal health and less effective for migraine (opioids and butalbital) were used frequently, whereas other treatments that may have low teratogenic risk (nerve blocks, IV fluid boluses, and triptans) were used less or not at all. These results indicate a need for developing guidelines and protocols to standardize acute treatment of migraine in pregnancy.

13. Better Living: Happiness at Work and Developing your Passion

A. Happiness of Work

You don’t need to change everything about your job to see major benefits. A few changes here and there can be all you need.

Tim Herrera. NY Times. April 7, 2019

Do you like what you do?

Now, I don’t mean that in the broad sense of wondering whether you’re on the right career path. I mean on a day-to-day basis, if you thought about every single task your job entails, could you name the parts that give you genuine joy? What about the tasks you hate?
It’s an odd question. We don’t often step back to ask whether the small, individual components of our job actually make us happy.

But maybe we should. As many as a third of United States workers say they don’t feel engaged at work. The reasons vary widely, and everyone’s relationship with work is unique. But there are small ways to improve any job, and those incremental improvements can add up to major increases in job satisfaction.

study from the Mayo Clinic found that physicians who spend about 20 percent of their time doing “work they find most meaningful are at dramatically lower risk for burnout.” But here’s what’s fascinating: Anything beyond that 20 percent has a marginal impact, as “spending 50 percent of your time in the most meaningful area is associated with similar rates of burnout as 20 percent.”

In other words: You don’t need to change everything about your job to see substantial benefits. A few changes here and there can be all you need.

“When you look at people who are thriving in their jobs, you notice that they didn’t find them, they made them,” said Ashley Goodall, senior vice president of leadership and team intelligence at Cisco and co-author of the book “Nine Lies About Work.”

“We’re told in every commencement speech that if you find a job you love you’ll never work a day in your life. But the verb is wrong,” he said, adding that successful people who love their jobs take “the job that was there at the beginning and then over time they transform the contents of that job.”

Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout

Shanafelt TD, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(1):129-146

These are challenging times for health care executives. The health care field is experiencing unprecedented changes that threaten the survival of many health care organizations. To successfully navigate these challenges, health care executives need committed and productive physicians working in collaboration with organization leaders. Unfortunately, national studies suggest that at least 50% of US physicians are experiencing professional burnout, indicating that most executives face this challenge with a disillusioned physician workforce. Burnout is a syndrome characterized by exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced effectiveness. Physician burnout has been shown to influence quality of care, patient safety, physician turnover, and patient satisfaction.

Although burnout is a system issue, most institutions operate under the erroneous framework that burnout and professional satisfaction are solely the responsibility of the individual physician. Engagement is the positive antithesis of burnout and is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption in work. There is a strong business case for organizations to invest in efforts to reduce physician burnout and promote engagement. Herein, we summarize 9 organizational strategies to promote physician engagement and describe how we have operationalized some of these approaches at Mayo Clinic. Our experience demonstrates that deliberate, sustained, and comprehensive efforts by the organization to reduce burnout and promote engagement can make a difference. Many effective interventions are relatively inexpensive, and small investments can have a large impact. Leadership and sustained attention from the highest level of the organization are the keys to making progress.


B. Why ‘Find Your Passion’ Is Such Terrible Advice

Prepare for a hard truth: We’re pretty bad at most things when we first try them.

Stephanie Lee. NY Times. April 21, 2019

Are you passionate about your work? Fulfilled in every aspect of your career?

If yes, congratulations! You’ve done what we all strive for but rarely achieve.

As for the rest of us, there’s hope: Part of why we haven’t found our passion yet is that we tend to give up quickly on new things. The reason? Prepare for a hard truth: We’re pretty bad at most things when we first try them.

People “often assume that their own interest or passion just needs to be ‘found’ or revealed. Once revealed, it will be in a fully formed state,” said Paul A. O’Keefe, an assistant professor of psychology at Yale-NUS College in Singapore. Nonsense, of course, he said.

“By that logic, pursuing one’s passion should come with boundless motivation and should be relatively easy,” he said.

Dr. O’Keefe was part of a team that published a study in 2018 that examined how two different “implicit theories of interest” impacted how people approach new potential passions. One, the fixed theory, says that our interests are relatively fixed and unchanging, while the other, the growth theory, suggests our interests are developed over time and not necessarily innate to our personality.

In other words: Do we truly find our passions, or develop them over time? (You can probably guess where this is going.)

The researchers found that people who hold a fixed theory had less interest in things outside of their current interests, were less likely to anticipate difficulties when pursuing new interests, and lost interest in new things much quicker than people who hold a growth theory. In essence, people with a growth mind-set of interest tend to believe that interests and passions are capable of developing with enough time, effort and investment.

“This comes down to the expectations people have when pursuing a passion,” Dr. O’Keefe said. “Someone with a fixed mind-set of interest might begin their pursuit with lots of enthusiasm, but it might diminish once things get too challenging or tedious.”


The source study: O'Keefe PA, et al. Implicit Theories of Interest: Finding Your Passion or Developing It? Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct;29(10):1653-1664.

People are often told to find their passion, as though passions and interests are preformed and must simply be discovered. This idea, however, has hidden motivational implications. Five studies examined implicit theories of interest-the idea that personal interests are relatively fixed (fixed theory) or developed (growth theory). Whether assessed or experimentally induced, a fixed theory was more likely to dampen interest in areas outside people's existing interests (Studies 1-3). Individuals endorsing a fixed theory were also more likely to anticipate boundless motivation when passions were found, not anticipating possible difficulties (Study 4). Moreover, when it became difficult to engage in a new interest, interest flagged significantly more for people induced to hold a fixed rather than a growth theory of interest (Study 5). Urging people to find their passion may lead them to put all their eggs in one basket but then to drop that basket when it becomes difficult to carry.


14. On Stroke

A. Post-Thrombolysis Recanalization in Stroke Referrals for Thrombectomy

Seners P, et al. Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2975–2982.

Background and Purpose—
Whether all acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion need to undergo intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is debated as (1) the incidence of post-thrombolysis early recanalization (ER) is still unclear; (2) thrombolysis may be harmful in patients unlikely to recanalize; and, conversely, (3) transfer for MT may be unnecessary in patients highly likely to recanalize. Here, we determined the incidence and predictors of post-thrombolysis ER in patients referred for MT and derive ER prediction scores for trial design.

Methods—
Registries from 4 MT-capable centers gathering patients referred for MT and thrombolyzed either on site (mothership) or in a non MT-capable center (drip-and-ship) after magnetic resonance– or computed tomography–based imaging between 2015 and 2017. ER was identified on either first angiographic run or noninvasive imaging. In the magnetic resonance imaging subsample, thrombus length was determined on T2*-based susceptibility vessel sign. Independent predictors of no-ER were identified using multivariable logistic regression models, and scores were developed according to the magnitude of regression coefficients. Similar registries from 4 additional MT-capable centers were used as validation cohort.

Results—
In the derivation cohort (N=633), ER incidence was ≈20%. In patients with susceptibility vessel sign (n=498), no-ER was independently predicted by long thrombus, proximal occlusion, and mothership paradigm. A 6-point score derived from these variables showed strong discriminative power for no-ER (C statistic, 0.854) and was replicated in the validation cohort (n=353; C statistic, 0.888). A second score derived from the whole sample (including negative T2* or computed tomography–based imaging) also showed good discriminative power and was similarly validated. Highest grades on both scores predicted no-ER with above 90% specificity, whereas low grades did not reliably predict ER.

Conclusions—
The substantial ER rate underlines the benefits derived from thrombolysis in bridging populations. Both prediction scores afforded high specificity for no-ER, but not for ER, which has implications for trial design.

Ryan Radecki’s comments: https://www.emlitofnote.com/?p=4391

B. Delayed Recognition of Acute Stroke by ED Staff Following Failure to Activate Stroke by EMS

Tennyson JC, et al. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2).

Introduction: Early recognition and pre-notification by emergency medical services (EMS) improves the timeliness of emergency department (ED) stroke care; however, little is known regarding the effects on care should EMS providers fail to pre-notify. We sought to determine if potential stroke patients transported by EMS, but for whom EMS did not provide pre-notification, suffer delays in ED door-to-stroke-team activation (DTA) as compared to the other available cohort of patients for whom the ED is not pre-notified–those arriving by private vehicle.

Methods: We queried our prospective stroke registry to identify consecutive stroke team activation patients over 12 months and retrospectively reviewed the electronic health record for each patient to validate registry data and abstract other clinical and operational data. We compared patients arriving by private vehicle to those arriving by EMS without pre-notification, and we employed a multivariable, penalized regression model to assess the probability of meeting the national DTA goal of ≤15 minutes, controlling for a variety of clinical factors.

Results: Our inclusion criteria were met by 200 patients. Overall performance of the regression model was excellent (area under the curve 0.929). Arrival via EMS without pre-notification, compared to arrival by private vehicle, was associated with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.96) for achieving DTA ≤ 15 minutes.

Conclusion: Our single-center data demonstrate that potential stroke patients arriving via EMS without pre-notification are less likely to meet the national DTA goal than patients arriving via other means. These data suggest a negative, unintended consequence of otherwise highly successful EMS efforts to improve stroke care, the root of which may be ED staff over-reliance on EMS for stroke recognition.


C. A Battle for My Life: A Patient’s Report on SAH

I had just finished filming Season 1 of “Game of Thrones.” Then I was struck with the first of two aneurysms.

Emilia Clarke. The New Yorker. March 21, 2019

…I was getting dressed in the locker room of a gym in Crouch End, North London, when I started to feel a bad headache coming on. I was so fatigued that I could barely put on my sneakers. When I started my workout, I had to force myself through the first few exercises.

Then my trainer had me get into the plank position, and I immediately felt as though an elastic band were squeezing my brain. I tried to ignore the pain and push through it, but I just couldn’t. I told my trainer I had to take a break. Somehow, almost crawling, I made it to the locker room. I reached the toilet, sank to my knees, and proceeded to be violently, voluminously ill. Meanwhile, the pain—shooting, stabbing, constricting pain—was getting worse. At some level, I knew what was happening: my brain was damaged.

For a few moments, I tried to will away the pain and the nausea. I said to myself, “I will not be paralyzed.” I moved my fingers and toes to make sure that was true…


15. Psych and Substance Abuse

A. Assessing Risk of Future Suicidality in ED Patients.

Brucker K, et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;26(4):376-383.

Introduction
With more than 4 million visits to the ED annually in the United States for mental disorders, the ED is considered by many to be the first line of evaluation for patients at risk and in crisis, with or without overt suicidality (ideation, attempts).1 The weighted national estimate of patients with a diagnosis of “suicide or intentional self‐harm” in the National Emergency Department Sample for 2013 was 1,411,770, patients, with 98.8% of those with suicidality as a first diagnosis discharged from the ED. In 2013, visits for suicidal ideation accounted for nearly 1% of all adult ED visits (108.3 million visits).2

To better predict and prevent suicides, emergency care providers need improved risk stratification tools for patients with overt or covert mental health crisis. Several tools—PHQ93, the ED‐Safe Patient Safety Screener4 and the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire–Revised (SBQ‐R)5—have been created and validated for suicide screening. All of these include direct questioning about current or recent suicidal thoughts. None of these tools has been compared to physician gestalt or evaluated for their ability to predict rates of adverse suicide‐related events in patients who screen negative using the tool. There are yet no widespread clinically used simple objective tools to assess and track changes in suicidal risk without asking the individuals directly, although others in the field besides us are actively working on this problem and progress is being made (for example Nock and colleagues,6, 7 Boudreaux and colleagues8-10). Such tools are desperately needed, as individuals at risk may choose not to share their ideation or intent with others, for fear of stigma or hospitalization or that in fact their plans may be thwarted.

The Convergent Functional Information for Suicidality (CFI‐S) is a novel suicide risk instrument that comprises 22 questions and has shown good to excellent predictive value for suicidality in settings other than the emergency department (ED).11-13 The CFI‐S is a checklist of risk factors for suicidality from a variety of domains including life satisfaction, mental health, physical health, environmental stress, addictions, cultural factors, and demographic information and assigns a numeric point value for each response, 0 for absent or 1 for present. In essence, it is a “polyphenic” risk score, by analogy with polygenic risk scores. The tool was designed to be easy to score by self‐administration or clinician administration or based on medical records or next‐of‐kin information. Of note, it does not ask directly about suicidal ideation, as that is a delicate question in many nonspecialized settings, and people who are truly suicidal might not share that information for fear of being stopped.

We hypothesized that the CFI‐S could be used in a heterogeneous sample of ED patients to identify high‐risk patients whose elevated risk was missed by both standard screening and by physician evaluation as measured by their gestalt impression of future risk.

We sought to test the accuracy of the CFI‐S and physician gestalt visual analog scale (VAS) in a sample of urban ED patients, with a traditionally high proportion of non‐Caucasians and low‐income individuals. The reason for this is this population has a higher‐than‐average risk of suicidality14 but with the lowest access to mental health services.15 Thus, in this population, the need for accurate suicide risk assessment is compounded by the lack of current identification of nonovert suicidal ideation and the need for pragmatic use of limited resources.

BACKGROUND:
Emergency departments (ED) are the first line of evaluation for patients at risk and in crisis, with or without overt suicidality (ideation, attempts). Currently employed triage and assessments methods miss some of the individuals who subsequently become suicidal. The Convergent Functional Information for Suicidality (CFI-S) 22-item checklist of risk factors, which does not ask directly about suicidal ideation, has demonstrated good predictive ability for suicidality in previous studies in psychiatrict patients but has not been tested in the real-world setting of EDs.

METHODS:
We administered CFI-S prospectively to a convenience sample of consecutive ED patients. Patients were also asked at triage about suicidal thoughts or intentions per standard ED suicide clinical screening (SCS), and the treating ED physician was asked to fill a physician gestalt visual analog scale (VAS) for likelihood of future suicidality spectrum events (SSE; ideation, preparatory acts, attempts, completed suicide). We performed structured chart review and telephone follow-up at 6 months post-index visit.

RESULTS:
The median time to complete the CFI-S was 3 minutes (first to third quartile = 3-6 minutes). Of the 338 patients enrolled, 45 (13.3%) were positive on the initial SCS, and 32 (9.5%) experienced a SSE in the 6 months of follow-up. Overall, SCS had modest diagnostic accuracy sensitivity 14/32 = 44%, (95% CI: 26-62%) and specificity 275/306 = 90%, (86-93%). The physician VAS also had moderate overall diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.75, confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-0.85), and the CFI-S was best (AUC = 0.81, CI = 0.76-0.87). The top CFI-S differentiating items were psychiatric illness, perceived uselessness, and social isolation.

CONCLUSIONS:
Using CFI-S, or some of its items, in busy EDs may help improve the detection of patients at high risk for future suicidality.

See also “Youth ED Visits for Suicidality Doubled from 2007 to 2015”. Subscription required: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2730063

B. Benzos vs barbs for alcohol withdrawal: Analysis of 3 different treatment protocols.

Nelson AC, et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):733-736.

INTRODUCTION:
Alcohol withdrawal treatment varies widely. Benzodiazepines are the standard of care, with rapid onset and long durations of action. Recent drug shortages involving IV benzodiazepines have required incorporation of alternative agents into treatment protocols. Phenobarbital has similar pharmacokinetics to select benzodiazepines frequently used for alcohol withdrawal. The objective of this study is to describe the effectiveness and safety of our institutional protocols during three time periods utilizing benzodiazepines and barbiturates for the acute treatment of alcohol withdrawal in the emergency department.

METHODS:
Adult patients presenting to the ED for acute alcohol withdrawal from April 1st, 2016 to January 31st, 2018 were reviewed. Patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included. Treatments were based on availability of medication and given protocol at time of presentation. The primary outcome was the rate of ICU admission.

RESULTS:
300 patient encounters were included. Overall baseline characteristics were equal across groups, except for age. There was no difference in rate of ICU admission from the ED between groups (D:8, L&P:11, P:13 patients, p = 0.99). Rate of mechanical ventilation was no different across all groups (D:1, L&P:3, P:3 patients, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION:
During benzodiazepine shortages, phenobarbital is a safe and effective treatment alternative for alcohol withdrawal. Incorporating phenobarbital into a benzodiazepine based protocol or as sole agent led to similar rates of ICU admission, length of stay, and need for mechanical ventilation in patients treated for alcohol withdrawal in the emergency department.

16. Utilizing the Boston Syncope Observation Management Pathway to Reduce Hospital Admission and Decrease Adverse Outcomes.

Mechanic OJ, et al.  West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2).

Introduction: In an age of increasing scrutiny of each hospital admission, emergency department (ED) observation has been identified as a low-cost alternative. Prior studies have shown admission rates for syncope in the United States to be as high as 70%. However, the safety and utility of substituting ED observation unit (EDOU) syncope management has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of EDOU for the management of patients presenting to the ED with syncope and its efficacy in reducing hospital admissions.

Methods: This was a prospective before-and-after cohort study of consecutive patients presenting with syncope who were seen in an urban ED and were either admitted to the hospital, discharged, or placed in the EDOU. We first performed an observation study of syncope management and then implemented an ED observation-based management pathway. We identified critical interventions and 30-day outcomes. We compared proportions of admissions and adverse events rates with a chi- squared or Fisher’s exact test.

Results: In the “before” phase, 570 patients were enrolled, with 334 (59%) admitted and 27 (5%) placed in the EDOU; 3% of patients discharged from the ED had critical interventions within 30 days and 10% returned. After the management pathway was introduced, 489 patients were enrolled; 34% (p less than 0.001) of pathway patients were admitted while 20% were placed in the EDOU; 3% (p=0.99) of discharged patients had critical interventions at 30 days and 3% returned (p=0.001).

Conclusion: A focused syncope management pathway effectively reduces hospital admissions and adverse events following discharge and returns to the ED.

To see the “Boston Syncope Pathway”, see the full-text (free): https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bq2t7rf

17. A comparison of early vs delayed elective electrical cardioversion for recurrent episodes of persistent A Fib: A multi-center study.

Voskoboinik A, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;284:33-37.

BACKGROUND:
Due to barriers to accessing timely elective electrical cardioversion (CV) for persistent AF (PeAF), we adopted a policy of instructing patients to present directly to the Emergency Department (ED) for CV.

OBJECTIVE:
We compare a strategy of Emergency CV (ED-CV) versus Elective CV (EL-CV) for treatment of symptomatic PeAF.

METHODS:
Between 2014 and 7, we evaluated 150 patients undergoing CV for PeAF. ED-CV patients were provided an AF action plan for recurrent symptoms and advised to present to ED within 36 h. EL-CV patients followed standard care, including cardiologist referral and placement on an elective hospital waiting list. Follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS:
We included 75 consecutive ED-CV patients and 75 consecutive EL-CV patients. ED-CV patients had a significantly shorter median AF duration prior to CV (1 day vs 3 months; p less than 0.01) and less overall AF-related symptoms at 12 months (modified EHRA symptom score ≥ 2a in 44% vs 72%; p = 0.005). Time to next AF recurrence was longer in the ED-CV group (295 ± 15 vs 245 ± 15 days; logrank p = 0.001), as was time to AF ablation referral (314 ± 13 vs 276 ± 15 days; logrank p = 0.01). Baseline LA area was similar (ED-CV 27 ± 4 cm2 vs EL-CV 28 ± 11 cm2; p = 0.67), however EL-CV had larger atria at follow-up (31 ± 8 vs 26 ± 6 cm2; p = 0.01). There were no complications in either group.

CONCLUSION:
ED-CV is an acceptable strategy for symptomatic PeAF. In addition to reduced time spent in AF and improved symptom scores, this strategy may also slow progression of atrial substrate & delay onset of next AF episode.

18. Standard long IV catheters versus extended dwell catheters: A randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided catheter survival.

Bahl A, et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):715-721

INTRODUCTION:
Establishing peripheral intravenous (IV) access is a vital step in providing emergency care. Ten to 30% of Emergency Department (ED) patients have difficult vascular access (DVA). Even after cannulation, early failure of US-guided IV catheters is a common complication. The primary goal of this study was to compare survival of a standard long IV catheter to a longer extended dwell catheter.

METHODS:
This study was a prospective, randomized comparative evaluation of catheter longevity. Two catheters were used in the comparison: [1] a standard long IV catheter, the 4.78 cm 20 gauge Becton Dickinson (BD); and [2] a 6 cm 3 French (19.5 gauge) Access Scientific POWERWAND™ extended dwell catheter (EDC). Adult DVA patients in the ED with vein depths of 1.20 cm-1.60 cm and expected hospital admissions of at least 24 h were recruited.

RESULTS:
120 patients were enrolled. Ultimately, 70 patients were included in the survival analysis, with 33 patients in the EDC group and 37 patients in the standard long IV group. EDC catheters had lower rates of failure (p = 0.0016). Time to median catheter survival was 4.04 days for EDC catheters versus 1.25 days for the standard long IV catheter. Multivariate survival analysis also showed a significant survival benefit for the EDC catheter (p = 0.0360).

CONCLUSION:
A longer extended dwell catheter represents a viable and favorable alternative to the standard longer IVs used for US-guided cannulation of veins above 1.20 cm in depth. These catheters have significantly improved survival rates with similar insertion success characteristics.


19. Reducing ED Length of Stay

Mercer MP et al. JAMA.  2019;321(14):1402-1403.

Case Summary

A middle-aged woman injured her wrist during a fall. She went to the emergency department (ED) but left without being seen by a clinician after waiting 4 hours. Three days later, she returned with continued wrist swelling and pain but was worried that another long wait could cause her to be late for work. She wondered if her primary care physician’s next available appointment in a month would be sufficient to address her injury. She was eventually seen and diagnosed as having a scaphoid fracture. A splint was placed and a follow-up appointment was made with an orthopedic surgeon. The total ED length of stay was 6 hours. The patient was concerned that her delay in receiving treatment may have long-term consequences for her physical function and made a complaint to the hospital.

What Should Be Done Next?
 
1.Apologize to the patient and state that ED staff are working hard with limited resources.

2.Explain to the patient that a delay in treatment will not affect her recovery given a low-acuity injury.

3.Instruct the physician who was on duty during the patient’s initial visit on how to work more efficiently.

4.Assemble an interdisciplinary team to evaluate the flow of patients through the ED to reduce wait times and improve access to care.

Consider the Options
 
Apologizing to the patient helps patients know that concerns they have are important, but it does not address the core problem of long ED wait times. Trauma centers, teaching hospitals, and safety net hospitals may have longer lengths of stay and higher rates of patients leaving without being seen compared with nonteaching, for-profit hospitals.1

The second option dismisses the patient’s injury as nonurgent, which is neither patient centered nor medically appropriate. Although it recognizes that the needs of critically ill patients must be prioritized, no consideration is given to the broader effect of longer wait times.

The third scenario implies that ED staff are not already working at maximal effort. Targeting individual physicians perpetuates the myth that individual heroics can overcome systemic deficiencies. This approach ignores literature demonstrating that EDs typically have extreme crowding and the reality of increasing demand for acute care.2,3 Focusing on an individual clinician ignores systemic issues and precludes the ability to achieve lasting change.

A fourth option is to participate in coordinated, interdisciplinary improvement efforts to create efficient, patient-centered processes. This approach has the greatest potential for achieving and sustaining meaningful change.4

The ED team chose to pursue this fourth option, recognizing that long wait times affected nearly all patients, with implications for safety and quality of care.

Analysis of the Case
 
An interdisciplinary team of front-line physicians, nurses, medical assistants, and executives assembled and used value stream mapping to assess the entire ED care process, from patient arrival to admission or discharge. Value stream mapping uses visual documentation to analyze all repeatable steps in a care delivery process.5 The team closely observed each step of care (eg, registration through discharge) from the patient perspective and built a schematic representation of each step, including any waits or delays. The finished map helps teams identify opportunities for improvement (eFigure in the Supplement). Executive staff participating in this process spent significant amounts of time in the ED, observing the rapid pace of work and crowded conditions. For the ED staff, the mapping process enabled them to personally experience the delays and crowding from patients’ perspectives. By direct observation, the team members noted many inefficiencies and errors experienced by both patients and staff. For example, the team found that it took 75 minutes and 3 different monitors (because of broken equipment) for a nurse to complete the preliminary orders for a patient with chest pain. In addition, a triage nurse and a patient with a simple hand laceration walked to several areas of the ED before finding an open hallway chair to wait to be seen.

Variability in the evaluation and treatment processes for patients was identified as a root cause of delays in care. For patients with low-acuity suspected simple fractures, there was no standard process to determine (1) if x-ray imaging would be ordered in triage or only after clinician assessment; (2) what type of clinician (nurse practitioner, trainee, or physician) would initiate care; or (3) if the patient should follow up in an outpatient orthopedics clinic or receive definitive care with an in-person consultation in the ED.

Comingling patients with high- and low-acuity conditions together throughout the ED exacerbated the variability in care processes. The urgent needs of high-acuity conditions routinely led to long delays in care of patients with lower-acuity conditions. Such delays frustrated patients and resulted in a misalignment of work needed by physicians and nurses to care for all patients in a timely manner.

Further examination of the health system revealed broader issues that impeded ED flow. For example, limited patient access to same-day primary care and urgent care contributed to increasing low-acuity ED patient volume. Limited hospital bed capacity resulted in frequent boarding of patients in the ED, reducing the availability of treatment space for new acute care patients.

Correct the Errors

1. Creating a fast-track care pathway for patients with low-acuity conditions. In this hospital, more than 65 patients per day (30% of ED patient volume) had low-acuity conditions. The team developed a uniform care pathway called Fast Track that included strict inclusion and exclusion criteria of low-acuity conditions such as dysuria or cough in patients with normal vital signs. There was a standardized workflow for managing these patients throughout the ED stay that included assigned roles and actions for each staff member from rooming the patient to delivering discharge instructions (eFigure in the Supplement). By cohorting patients with low-acuity conditions and implementing a standard workflow, the staff could estimate the resources needed to accommodate patient demand. It was determined that 6 treatment spaces and a flexible treatment team were needed, a solution that had been successful at other institutions.5,6 

2. Standardized processes. After designation of a treatment area and team, a daily team huddle was developed. At the start of each shift, expectations for each staff member were reviewed. For example, medical assistants reviewed specific procedures for wound care preparation, while physicians and nurse practitioners reviewed the standard approach to charting and discharge practices. Standard processes for rooming, documentation, procedures, and discharges were reinforced through coaching by departmental leaders, which included managers, peer nurses, medical assistants, and physicians who participated in the new process design and testing. The daily huddle provided opportunities for staff to ask questions, offer feedback for improvement, and troubleshoot issues in real time.

3. Dissemination of real-time performance metrics. After standard processes were implemented, daily data reports were shared with frontline and executive staff, facilitating adjustments of the new processes. For instance, when the team moved Fast Track to a different physical location within the ED, rates for length of stay and patients leaving without being seen worsened by 30%. This real-time data allowed the team to address the new problems efficiently.

4. Staffing to maintain team consistency. Data analysis revealed that 30% of patient volume could be managed by a small interdisciplinary team. This improvement was best achieved by positioning the Fast Track team in a separate geographical area of the ED, which enabled increased capacity for managing more complex patients in other parts of the ED.

5. Engagement and alignment with executive strategic plan. Engagement of hospital executive sponsors, including the chief of staff, chief quality officer, chief nursing office, chief medical officer, and chief executive officer, via daily data-driven huddles, weekly planning sessions, and quarterly workshops helped accelerate ED improvement efforts. Through these interactions, the executive team developed a clearer understanding of ED improvement needs and were able to facilitate integration of ED issues into hospital-wide strategic objectives, such as reducing ED boarding and ambulance diversion. This executive-level involvement also facilitated qualitative improvements in ED patient and staff experience. For example, observing the burden of nonclinical work asked of ED staff to manage after-hours visitors for the entire hospital resulted in increasing the main hospital building’s security hours and the addition of a patient navigator available to the ED.

Outcomes
 
After the initiation of the Fast Track process in December 2015, and without making any other changes to ED workflow or staffing, there was a 25% decrease in the length of stay of patients with low-acuity conditions (from 190 minutes to less than 150 minutes) and the rate of patients leaving without being seen decreased from 8% to 4% in just 5 months. At the same time, patients with moderate- and high-acuity conditions who were discharged had reduced length of stay in the ED and stable or reduced rates of leaving without being seen because of increased capacity in high-acuity treatment areas.

Bottom Line

1. Multidisciplinary engagement of both frontline and executive staff by ED leadership, coupled with clear standards and real-time data, are essential to the success and sustainability of any improvement work.

2. Separating patients with low- and high-acuity conditions in the ED can enhance the efficiency of managing both groups.

3. Frequent review of performance metrics by frontline staff and hospital leadership facilitates real-time recognition of problems and evaluation of changes.

21. US ED Visits and Hospital Discharges Among Uninsured Patients Before and After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act

Singer AJ, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(4):e192662..2019.2662

Key Points
Question  Were the 2014 insurance provisions in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) associated with changes in US emergency department (ED) visits or hospital discharges among uninsured individuals?

Findings  In this cross-sectional study of 1.4 billion US ED visits from between 2006 and 2016 and 405 million hospital discharges between 2006 and 2016, proportions of ED visits and hospital discharges by uninsured patients declined from 16% to 8% and 6% to 4%, respectively, after the 2014 ACA insurance expansions. Among patients aged 18 to 64 years, declines were from 20% to 11% and 10% to 7%, respectively.

Meaning  The implementation of the ACA insurance provisions in 2014 was associated with decreased ED and hospital use by uninsured individuals, but by 2016 many patients seeking care in US hospitals remained uninsured.

Abstract
Importance  The US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) was enacted in 2010 with several provisions that targeted reducing numbers of uninsured Americans.

Objective  To assess the numbers and proportion of emergency department (ED) visits (2006-2016) and hospital discharges (2006-2016) by uninsured patients, focusing on the 2014 ACA insurance reforms (Medicaid expansion, individual mandate, and private insurance exchanges).

Design, Setting, and Participants  Cross-sectional study of visitors to US EDs and patients discharged from US hospitals using National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey data and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data, respectively, from 2006 to 2016. Data analysis took place in February 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Numbers and proportions of total and uninsured ED visits and hospital discharges. Simple descriptive statistics and interrupted time-series analysis were used to assess changes in uninsured visits over time and after the implementation of insurance provisions in 2014.

Results  There were an estimated 1.4 billion US ED visits from 2006 to 2016 and 405 million hospital discharges from 2006 to 2016. Over the study period, ED visits increased by 2.3 million per year, while hospital discharges decreased from approximately 38 million per year prior to 2009 to approximately 36 million per year after, with no clear decrease after 2013. Proportions of uninsured ED visits were largely unchanged from 2006 (16%) until 2013 (14%) (−0.2 percentage point per year; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.01 percentage point; P = .11) but then decreased by 2.1 percentage points per year from 2014 to 2016 (95% CI, −4.3 to −1.8 percentage points; P = .003), with uninsured visits composing 8% of the total in 2016. For patients aged 18 to 64 years, uninsured ED visits declined from approximately 20% from 2006 through 2013 to 11% in 2016 (3.1% decrease per year after 2013; 95% CI, −4.3 to −1.8 percentage points; P = .003). The proportion of hospital discharges by uninsured patients remained steady at approximately 6% from 2006 to 2013, then declined to 5% in 2014 and 4% in 2016. Similar changes were seen for patients aged 18 to 64 years, with a decrease in hospital discharges from 10% to 7% over the study period.

Conclusions and Relevance  Proportions of ED visits and hospital discharges by uninsured patients decreased considerably after the implementation of the 2014 ACA insurance provisions. Despite these changes, approximately 1 in 10 ED visits and 1 in 20 hospital discharges were made by uninsured individuals in 2014 to 2016. This suggests that continued attention is needed to address the lack of insurance in US hospital visits, particularly among people aged 18 to 64 years who have less access to government-sponsored insurance.


22. Micro Bits

A. UBC researchers create robot to help soothe pain of neonatal intensive care unit babies

The Guardian
Nothing soothes a newborn's pain like the tender touch of a loving parent, but researchers at the University of B.C. hope their new robot might help sometimes. "Calmer" was created to mimic hand-hugging, a treatment in which a premature baby's head, hands and legs are gently held in a curled position to help manage pain from medical procedures. Lead inventor Liisa Holsti developed the robot with colleagues at UBC and said it mimics some of the therapeutic aspects of skin-to-skin holding. 


B. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

B1. Warnings of a Dark Side to A.I. in Health Care

Last year, the Food and Drug Administration approved a device that can capture an image of your retina and automatically detect signs of diabetic blindness.

This new breed of artificial intelligence technology is rapidly spreading across the medical field, as scientists develop systems that can identify signs of illness and disease in a wide variety of images, from X-rays of the lungs to C.A.T. scans of the brain. These systems promise to help doctors evaluate patients more efficiently, and less expensively, than in the past.

Similar forms of artificial intelligence are likely to move beyond hospitals into the computer systems used by health care regulators, billing companies and insurance providers. Just as A.I. will help doctors check your eyes, lungs and other organs, it will help insurance providers determine reimbursement payments and policy fees.

Ideally, such systems would improve the efficiency of the health care system. But they may carry unintended consequences, a group of researchers at Harvard and M.I.T. warns.

In a paper published on Thursday in the journal Science, the researchers raise the prospect of “adversarial attacks” — manipulations that can change the behavior of A.I. systems using tiny pieces of digital data. By changing a few pixels on a lung scan, for instance, someone could fool an A.I. system into seeing an illness that is not really there, or not seeing one that is.


B2. How Can Doctors Be Sure A Self-Taught Computer Is Making The Right Diagnosis?

Richard Harris. NPR, All Things Considered. April 1, 2019

Some computer scientists are enthralled by programs that can teach themselves how to perform tasks, such as reading X-rays.

Many of these programs are called "black box" models because the scientists themselves don't know how they make their decisions. Already these black boxes are moving from the lab toward doctors' offices.

The technology has great allure, because computers could take over routine tasks and perform them as well as doctors do, possibly better. But as scientists work to develop these black boxes, they are also mindful of the pitfalls.

Pranav Rajpurkar, a computer science graduate student at Stanford University, got hooked on this idea after he discovered how easy it was to create these models.

The National Institutes of Health one weekend in 2017 made more than 100,000 chest X-rays publicly available, each tagged with the condition that the person had been diagnosed with. Rajpurkar texted a lab mate and suggested they should build a quick and dirty algorithm that could use the data to teach itself how to diagnose the conditions linked to the X-rays….


C. Laws Against Texting While Driving Reduced ED Visits
   
New evidence from Texas A&M School of Public Health indicates that texting-while-driving laws may avert the need for emergency treatment following a motor vehicle crash. Researchers found that states with a primary texting ban on all drivers on average saw an 8 percent reduction in emergency department visits resulting from a motor vehicle crash. The research, led by Alva O. Ferdinand, DrPH, JD, assistant professor at the School of Public Health, was published by the American Journal of Public Health. 


D. What Did the Apple Heart Study Really Find? Milton Packer dissects the data and proposes a formal challenge to tech giant

Six months ago in this space, I wondered if the new Apple Watch was the worst heart device ever. Some readers may have thought I was exaggerating. Others may have imagined that I was being too cynical.

But based on the results of the Apple Heart Study -- which were released at the American College of Cardiology meeting this week -- it is now official. The Apple Watch is a serious competitor for the worst heart device ever….


E. Personality Traits in Patients with MINOCA

MINOCA = Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries


F. Study: One in Six U.S. Children Has a Mental Illness

March 18, 2019 — Survey results indicate that as many as one in six U.S. children between the ages of 6 and 17 has a treatable mental health disorder such as depression, anxiety or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.


G. Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block for ED appendicitis pain control.


H. 200 People Possibly Exposed to Measles at California Emergency Department
   
USA Today
A Sacramento, California, medical center sent about 200 patients letters saying they might have been exposed to measles after a girl who visited the emergency department was diagnosed with the highly contagious infection. The young girl with measles visited the ED at UC Davis Medical Center on March 17, the center told USA TODAY. The letters were sent March 25 and 26.


I. Researchers Say They May Have Found the Cause of SIDS and Other Sudden Death Syndromes


J. Skipping breakfast tied to higher risk of heart-related death, study finds


K. 2018-2019 U.S. Flu Season: Preliminary Burden Estimates


L. Improving physician well-being: Lessons from palliative care
   
The well-being of doctors has become a primary concern of medical associations globally, and for good reason: physicians, on the whole, are not doing well. One relatively unexamined factor related to physician burnout is coping with patient death. Treating patients at the end of their lives, and coping with patient death, can undoubtedly cause stress, including burnout, but little research has documented this relationship empirically. One medical discipline deals with death more often, and much better, than most others: palliative care.


M. ACEP: Emergency Visits Reach All-Time High

Only 4.3 Percent of Emergency Visits Are Considered Nonurgent, New CDC Data Shows